🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold forecast – not just who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and has become a kind of local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into city data and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

How was your night?

I had to do that since they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani led the initial ballots by 12 points, but came large groups of ballots added after that and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible in which yesterday turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which the opponent was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However the winner added 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani get additional support from?

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse, youthful, tenants and residents struggling with costs

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president last year went for Zohran this year. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the record participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I figured it could exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to get over half. He has 50.4% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think certain, but I think probable, and I hope he achieves it because afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Including one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump area. That really surprised me. The independent held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained all of these Republicans on Staten Island who had a high participation. I believe there was significant tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and residents all went for Cuomo. So there existed some opposition. But no, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on whether the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly supportive. So I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from the left come from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that there will be additional examples – people will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that every city in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities we face.