🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.