🔗 Share this article

Itranspired Ruben Amorim was able to withstand a loss to Grimsby. Survive an important European final versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, laying waste to the team's most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to dance. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, like many a Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' championship 1994-95 season, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. The most distracted of readers will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated at his players for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the intense pressure and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most feared football executives.

In truth, this entire bruising episode appears to portray the director in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, given his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to view him as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive earlier, he has proved himself to be among the sport’s true generals: a strategic mind that the club's competitors are now justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Conflict Over Formation and Philosophy

To illustrate, it was the director who being involved in the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, played a key role in trying to persuade him to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these pleas met a certain resistance. However, these judgements carry more weight when delivered from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, holder of international appearances and a role in a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually he might agree to outline his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, without any penalty clause in place. The director seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – men like him – simply operate at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being prepared to receive.

The Supreme Power Behind the Throne

Naturally, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, merely executing the commands of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to adopt data science and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he declared that the team's approach of play “will be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate football matters, drawing from his previous experience in industry and sailing. Above all he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Whom else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that appears a lot like an abstract design, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Hierarchy: Directors Above Managers

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to join a club and implement their plan through to completion. Yet how many businesses have such individuals established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to determine the tactics in the boardroom and appoint someone who will adapt their offering to suit. If managers were once chefs, they have become more akin to delivery personnel: not really creating the product, yet finally accountable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, their job has become not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined while those individuals who hired him continue to make errors another day.

A Modern Corporate Football: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And possibly in a small way this represents corporate governance in action: the elevation of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss them for playing too much that system. Bring in the project manager and then discard them for taking excessive time. And above all be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – however well qualified – remain in control.